Thursday, February 21, 2008
Monday, February 18, 2008
What Is A "Monster" Bull?
As I mentioned previously I am not interested in Boone and Crockett scoring methods. I agree that if one is comparing elk racks on a completely objective basis, then some standard method must be utilized. I have no argument with this concept. From my point however I am not interested in worrying about how a certain type of point or point configuration subtracts points from an overall score, etc., but simply that the animal is an outstanding specimen and impressive to look at and photograph!
I also would like to make clear that defining an elk as a 6x6 or 7x7, etc., does not begin to tell the entire story. Some extremely impressive animals may only have this number of points and may be more pleasing to look at than larger bulls that have many more points. They may also have a much greater antler mass than young or middle aged bulls with the same number of points.
Canon L2: Video Still Capture (1999),Most likely a 7x8
Canon L2: Video Still Capture (2000)
On the other hand, some bulls may never grow a large rack; no matter what age they reach. A prime example of this was the famous character bull “Bad Boy”, which for a time may have been the most frequently seen and photographed bull on Winslow Hill. He was the first bull I videotaped in 1995 and I recorded him during the last rut that he was alive. By that time his rack was markedly smaller and he was showing all of the signs of advanced age. Perhaps in time I will devote a post or so to him, but I do not want to do the research at present. I cannot say what was the maximum number of points he grew with his largest rack, but the photograph posted today shows what was an average rack for this bull.
"Bad Boy" Canon Elan II: (2000) He never grew a large rack!
On reflection I realize that the short video clip posted on January 30th, does not tell the whole story of that encounter. I will likely post another portion or portions of that encounter soon. I have been editing this segment in depth in the past week. It is difficult to get an accurate count, but as best as I can tell in a two-day period, about ten bulls were in the area. For those familiar with Elk County this is the block of country between the parking lot below “The Gilbert Viewing Area, The Busy Bee Campground, and “The Saddle” which is now being strip mined and reclaimed as part of the Porcupine Hollow Reclamation Project which is intended to reduce acid mine runoff in The Dent’s Run watershed. The footage was taken in 1997.
Most of these bulls were present during all of the encounters that I recorded and many of them stayed in the area for the entire week. None of those bulls were the largest that the state has produced, but some were a short step from that class. These bulls represented a good cross section of the herd at that time with some up and coming young bulls, several mature bulls in their prime, one famous character bull know as “Screamer” that was just starting to decline, and another know as “Mean Bill” that was in his last year of life with very poor antlers.
To Be Continued:
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Comment by Jack of Elk County Outfitters
I was pleased to receive a comment from Jack Manack of Elk County Outfitters. Mr. Manack has established a blog to present the pro-hunt stance. We welcome him to the world of blogging and look forward to reading more of his views.
For those who would like to read a response from a member of the hunting community, please visit the post of Sunday, February 3, 2008 Titled PGC To Discontinue Controversial September Elk Hunt! and go to the comments section.
There are several excellent comments pertaining to elk in addition to Mr. Manack's response. Marvin from Arkansas gives some interesting insight on the situation in that state, while Michael Serafin from Michigan, who was at one time a Park Ranger in that state, also gives some input on the situation there.
Pennsylvania Elk Management:: Ralph Harrison Above And Beyond The Call Of Duty!
Scott Weidensaul wrote the script, and Rawland Cogan narrated it. There were also interviews with various DCNR and PGC officials.I have no idea what Mr. Weidensaul personal views were on the Elk hunt that was soon to follow. It is certain that Mr. Cogan was supportive of a hunt, if in fact he was not leading the charge.
Some of those involved in the effort were not supporters of an Elk hunt.
Billie Cromwell and Ronald Saffer turned out to be bitter opponents of the hunt. While I was not involved in the making of this video in any capacity; I did get to meet many of the people involved.
When I first went to the elk range in 1995 I was an avid deer, turkey, and squirrel hunter, but surprisingly I did not view the elk as objects of a possible hunt. Billie Cromwell and Ron Saffer, both were also dedicated deer hunters, although Billie did quit about the same time that I did, which was in 1997-98.
A. The Pennsylvania Elk Herd was a small herd. It had a large number of extremely impressive mature bulls that had not been hunted in nearly 70 years.
B. It is the nature of trophy hunting to take the largest and best animals. If a hunt was held it should be primarily for population control and should be held only as needed to keep herd numbers in line with the available food and habitat.
C. The herd was of great value to the citizens of Pennsylvania as a unique viewing experience.
In time I came to realize that three people had been involved with the elk for a long time. Two of them represented the old guard, which had a much more low key, approach to the elk. These persons were Ralph Harrison and Wildlife Conservation Officer Harold Harshbarger. The third was Rawland Cogan, the elk biologist at the time. He represented the new hard driving elk management policy, which seemed intent on establishing an elk hunt in the near future, although for a time he devoted much effort to expand the elk range by a trap and transfer program.
Mr. Harrison never had an official job in elk management. There was no big title, just a simple love and respect for the animals, which led him to go above and beyond the call of duty and dedicate his life to them. He has seen elk population grow from less than twenty to the 500-700 of today. Although he would never claim responsibility, he was an important factor in this increase. Like most true experts, he professes to know little about elk.
This is an extremely condensed history of the elk in Pennsylvania. The last Pennsylvania Elk was killed sometime in the late 1860s or early 1870s as a result of unregulated market hunting. In 1913 The Pennsylvania Game Commission released fifty animals in the north central part of the state. These animals were obtained from Yellowstone National Park. There were additional releases and in time the herd grew to the point that The PGC established a hunting season in 1923. Anyone with a general hunting license could kill an elk (bulls of 4 or more points were legal). In 1931 only one bull was killed and the season was closed in 1931 and remained so until 2001.
During this time the PGC lost interest in the herd and at times few even knew they existed, as what few remained stayed well away from human habitation in most cases. The population began to increase slowly in the 1950s.
Ralph recalls how he realized the elk herd was rebounding in the mid-1970s after a late August evening encounter with cows and calves in a meadow in which he heard bulls bugling in the woodlands. This so inspired him that he approached his boss the next day and outlined a proposal to help the elk herd survive and expand. Things progressed from there. A management plan was developed which included more public land acquisition and development of suitable elk habitat, but there were problems with a shortage of funds.
In a nutshell the PGC did re-introduce the elk in 1913, but when the population declined too much to support a hunt, they lost interest in the species. It was The Bureau of Forestry, inspired by Ralph Harrison that picked up the torch and brought the elk herd to the position it was in a few years ago. The PGC only entered the fray after Forestry had done the hard legwork to bring the herd back from the brink. It should be noted that this was the agency as a whole, not some of the dedicated Game Commission employees who were assigned to the area.
These included District Game Protectors Norm Erickson who served from late 1940s-1965 or 66, and Harold Harsbarger who ably filled the slot from 1966-97. PGC Wildlife Biologist Bill Drake was also numbered among these dedicated individuals. All were very interested in the welfare of the elk, even at times that The PGC as a whole was not.
If you can find Mr. Harrison’s books, they are well worth reading!
To be continued